EnglishEnglish
Views: 0 Author: Site Editor Publish Time: 2025-06-09 Origin: Site
Ever wondered which cone crusher fits your job better—HP or GP?Both crush rock, but they’re built for different tasks.
In this post, you’ll learn how HP and GP cone crushers compare in design, performance, and efficiency.
Metso is one of the world’s leading industrial equipment manufacturers.
They focus on mining, aggregates, recycling, and mineral processing.
Metso builds many types of crushers—but cone crushers are their specialty.
Two of their most well-known lines are:
● HP Series: High Performance
● GP Series: General Purpose
Each serves different crushing needs, from hard rock to high-volume operations.
The HP (High Performance) cone crusher is designed for demanding jobs.
It uses a multi-cylinder hydraulic system to power its crushing action.
The design focuses on:
● Fine material output
● High throughput
● Tight chamber control
This makes it ideal for secondary and tertiary crushing stages.
HP crushers work well in tough environments.
They’re widely used in:
● Mining operations where rock is extremely hard
● Aggregate plants that need fine material
● Quarries requiring consistent high-volume output
They also excel in mobile and fixed installations.
Feature | Description |
Multi-cylinder system | Independent hydraulic cylinders provide power |
Steep crushing chamber angle | Increases force, improves particle shape |
High reduction ratio | Maximizes output per cycle |
Constant feed design | Handles fluctuations in input load |
Automation compatibility | Works with IC70C and other control systems |
HP crushers are optimized for precision, force, and control—all with real-time automation support.
The GP (General Purpose) cone crusher is built for simplicity and strength.
It uses a single-cylinder system, which makes it easy to operate and maintain.
Its design supports a wide range of applications—from quarry use to aggregates.
GP crushers are known for their rugged frame and mechanical reliability.
GP crushers are commonly used in:
● Aggregates production
● Road and building construction
● Secondary or tertiary crushing lines
They handle both medium-hard and softer rock types.
These machines are flexible enough to fit mobile or fixed setups.
Feature | Description |
Single-cylinder system | Simplifies operation and maintenance |
Wider feed opening | Accepts larger feed sizes |
Rugged frame | Withstands vibration and heavy loads |
Fewer moving parts | Lowers risk of mechanical failure |
Mechanical setting control | Easy CSS adjustment using threaded rings |
⚙️ GP crushers are often chosen for their reliability and cost efficiency.
Aspect | HP Series | GP Series |
Cylinder Design | Multi-cylinder hydraulic | Single-cylinder hydraulic |
Chamber Shape | Steep, high-force | Flatter, more open |
Frame Design | Compact, reinforced | Simpler, robust |
Liner Types | Optimized for precision | Designed for versatility |
HP offers tighter control, while GP gives more flexibility and ease of repair.
HP crushers deliver finer product and higher reduction ratios.
GP crushers handle larger feed sizes with moderate reduction efficiency.
Metric | GP Cone Crusher | |
Max Feed Size | Smaller | Larger |
Product Shape | More Cubical | More Variable |
Capacity (same size) | Higher | Slightly Lower |
Choose HP for precision, GP for versatility and durability.
HP series is built for advanced automation.
It integrates with IC70C control systems, enabling:
● CSS auto-adjust
● Load monitoring
● Remote diagnostics
GP series supports manual or semi-automated control. Optional sensors and motors can be added.
Feature | HP Series | GP Series |
Control System | Full digital (IC70C) | Optional basic control |
Real-Time Adjust | Yes | Manual or semi-auto |
Sensor Integration | Full suite | Add-on |
GP wins in simplicity. Fewer cylinders, less wiring, and easier access.
HP, while more complex, offers better long-term performance when well maintained.
Maintenance Area | HP Series | GP Series |
Component Count | Higher | Lower |
Liner Change Time | Moderate | Faster |
Spare Parts Cost | Higher | Lower |
Troubleshooting | Needs skilled technician | Easier, manual checks |
GP is beginner-friendly, HP needs skilled support.
HP crushers consume more energy but produce finer material, reducing downstream needs.
GP crushers draw less power per ton but may require additional stages.
Efficiency Factor | HP Series | GP Series |
Power Draw (kW) | Higher | Lower |
Wear Life (liners) | Long | Moderate |
Cost per Ton | Balanced | Lower upfront cost |
HP = higher precision per kWh, GP = lower operating overhead.
Choosing between HP and GP comes down to what you’re crushing—and where.
HP cone crushers are great for:
● Hard rock like granite or basalt
● Mining operations needing fine product
● High-volume setups with constant feed
GP cone crushers work better for:
● Soft to medium-hard material
● Construction aggregates or road base
● Quarries with general crushing tasks
If you run a stationary plant, both work—but HP needs more support systems.
If you need a mobile setup, GP is simpler and more practical to move.
HP units offer more output and automation—but come at a higher price.
GP units cost less upfront. They’re easier to run and maintain.
Factor | HP Series | GP Series |
Initial Investment | High | Moderate |
Automation Level | Full (IC system) | Optional, basic control |
Wear Part Cost | Higher | Lower |
Long-Term ROI | High (if fully utilized) | Stable, lower risk |
If performance is critical, HP wins. If budget matters, GP gives you more control.
Feature | HP Series | GP Series |
Design | Multi-cylinder | Single-cylinder |
Performance | High output, fine product | General use, balanced |
Adjustment System | Hydraulic + automation | Mechanical + optional |
Maintenance | Complex, high-tech | Simpler, easy access |
Ideal Application | Mining, fine crushing | Quarry, secondary stages |
HP cone crushers offer higher speed and better shape. GP crushers provide versatility and simpler maintenance. Choose HP for fine crushing; GP suits wider applications. Always match crusher type to your specific project needs.Consult engineers or suppliers to ensure the best decision.
A: No, they use different liners due to distinct crushing chamber designs and operating principles.
A: The HP series offers more advanced automation and control features compared to the GP series.
A: Not always. HP excels in fine crushing, while GP can be more efficient for general or secondary applications.
A: Yes, they typically have lower maintenance needs and simpler components, reducing long-term costs.
A: GP cone crushers are preferred for mobile use due to their compact structure and installation flexibility.
